Sample deliverable · Copeland Commons is a fictional building · All findings, ratings, and costs are invented
Building Envelope Condition Assessment

Copeland Commons

Sample academic building
Project No.: SAMPLE Issued: October 7, 2026 Status: Sample deliverable
Oblique aerial view of Copeland Commons from the southeast, showing the south and east elevations, the roof, and the glass stair tower
Oblique aerial from the southeast (computer-generated). Click a label to jump to what we found there.
The short version

Copeland Commons’ brick and cast-stone walls are in fair condition overall. Four things sit at the top of the list: a bowed, cracked parapet corner with loose brick above the southwest walk, water reaching third-floor offices on the north side, a cracked glass unit in the stair tower, and a blocked roof drain that ponds after every rain. Most of the rest is the planned upkeep of a building this age: sealant, joints, flashings, and a roof membrane near the end of its life. We have grouped the work into five bid packages phased by season, with the disruptive work scheduled for when campus is least occupied.

Brick & cast-stone wallsGrouped aluminum windowsGlass entry atriumCurtain wall stair towerLow-slope membrane roof

Scope: building envelope only. Site and civil work, mechanical, electrical, and plumbing systems, and the structure are excluded.

Condition by elevation

Where each system stands

GoodFairPoorUrgentNot applicable
What we don’t know yet
  • The source of the north office leaks. Open glazing joints and failed perimeter sealant are both candidates; water testing will separate them ().
  • How far the parapet damage runs. One opening at the southwest corner found no through-wall flashing; two more openings will show whether the rest of the parapet was built the same way ().
  • The basement. Dampness was reported by facilities staff, but we have not been to the basement ().
  • The full extent of wet insulation. The infrared survey found one wet area; a second survey after the repairs will confirm it is dry ().
What happens next
  1. Sidewalk shed at the southwest corner, protection below the cracked tower glass, and the roof drain cleared (this month).
  2. Facilities reviews the five packages and the seasonal phasing on the Capital Plan view.
  3. CopelandBEC water-tests the north office windows and prepares bid documents for Packages A and B.

Building Explorer

Every finding sits where we saw it. Shaded zones show the extent of each repair as we would hand it to a contractor; numbered markers are individual observations. Pulsing markers are items to address now.

💡 How to use this view: pick a view of the building, hover a marker for a close-up, click it (or a shaded zone) for the full write-up. Filter by system or priority at right, and turn on the magnifier to look closely at the walls.

Priority

Systems

On this view

    Not shown on a view

      Building Systems

      The same findings, organized the way a contractor prices them and the way a capital plan funds them: by system. Each system carries an overall rating, a short read on its condition, and the photos behind it.

      Findings Index

      Every finding in one table. Filter it, search it, click a row to open the write-up, or take it with you as a spreadsheet.

      Capital Plan

      We group the work into bid packages a contractor can price on its own, then phase them by season so the safety items go first and the noisy, disruptive work lands when campus is least occupied. Costs are order-of-magnitude (Class 5) ranges in escalated dollars, for capital planning only.

      Phasing

      By bid package and season

      Sequencing reflects the higher-education preference for doing disruptive work when campus is least occupied, so most work is placed in summer (shaded), with quieter work in spring, fall, and over winter break. Make-safe items proceed as soon as they are approved. Bar labels show the high end of each package’s escalated construction cost in that season, before soft costs and contingency.

      The cost of waiting

      What happens if the program slips?

      Drag the slider to defer the whole program. Escalation raises the price of every item, and the items with active deterioration (open joints, wet insulation, loose brick) also grow in scope the longer water keeps getting in.

      Now12345 yrs

      Illustrative model: 4% annual escalation on every item, plus 6% annual scope growth on the items marked as active deterioration. Totals include the markups below. Not a prediction for this building.

      Order-of-magnitude cost

      Line items

      Basis: Class 5 order-of-magnitude estimate, 2026 unit costs for the Northeast U.S. market escalated at 4% per year to the planned season. Building envelope only; site, MEP, and structural work are excluded. Unit costs include access (lifts, swing stages, and roof protection). Quantities are illustrative for this sample; a real report takes them from our close-range survey and take-offs. Not a bid or a contractor price.

      Report & Exports

      The interactive page is how you explore the findings. It is not the only thing you get. The full written report, the PDF for the archive, and the spreadsheet for your facilities team all come from the same data as this page, so they always agree with each other.

      DOCPDF

      Narrative report

      The written report you are used to receiving, in CopelandBEC’s standard report format: an At-A-Glance Summary with key findings, recommendations, and an order-of-magnitude cost estimate, followed by appendices with field observations, testing, photographs, discussion, and a glossary. Download it in Word to edit, or as a PDF for the record.

      XLS

      Findings register

      Every finding as a row, with its system, priority, location, observation, discussion, recommendation, and bid package. Ready to sort, filter, and track repairs against.

      PDF

      Any view, as presented

      Every view on this page prints cleanly. Save the one on screen for a meeting handout, or all seven in order.

      HTML

      This page, for keeps

      This page is a single file with every photo and font inside it. It opens offline in any browser today and in ten years, with no login and nothing to install.

      Live preview · narrative report

      Our Approach

      How we would build the real version of this assessment for one of your buildings. Each step feeds a part of the deliverable you have just clicked through, and each is planned around how the building is used: class schedules, exams, and Commencement on a campus; tenants and business hours elsewhere.

      1

      Records & conversations

      We review the original drawings, past repair and roofing records, and talk with your facilities staff about leaks and problem areas. Their reports become the “reported by” notes on each finding.

      2

      Roof & ground survey

      We walk the roof and the grounds, and photograph every elevation by drone. This is where the views and markers on the Building Explorer come from.

      3

      Close-range survey

      From a lift at representative drops, we look at the brick, cast stone, sealant, and glass within arm’s reach, and photograph what we find. Ratings and quantities come from here.

      4

      Inspection openings

      We open the wall where the surface can’t tell the whole story, such as a parapet or a window head, to see the flashings, ties, and lintels inside.

      5

      Testing

      Water testing at reported windows (ASTM E1105), sealant adhesion (ASTM C1521), and an infrared survey of the roof after sunset.

      6

      Report, plan & packages

      An interactive report like this one, the full narrative report and PDF, the findings register, and scope narratives ready to issue for contractor bids.

      What you receive
      • This interactive report, hosted for your team or sent as a single file that opens offline in any browser.
      • The full narrative report in Word and PDF, with the same findings, photos, and tables, for the project record.
      • A findings register that facilities staff can track repairs against.
      • Bid-package scope narratives and an order-of-magnitude cost estimate, phased around how the building is used.
      • A working session to walk your team through the findings, on screen.
      • A clear scope: the building envelope only. Site and civil work, MEP systems, and structure are excluded unless they affect the envelope.
      How we write findings
      • What we saw is kept apart from what we think. Each finding has an observation, then a separately labelled discussion of why it matters.
      • We say where information came from: observed by CopelandBEC, reported by staff, or not yet investigated.
      • Gaps stay visible. If we couldn’t see it, the report says so instead of skipping it.

      Your buildings, seen this clearly.

      Copeland Commons is invented. The way of working is not. We would welcome the chance to walk your team through what a real assessment could look like for the buildings on your list.

      Copeland Building Envelope Consulting